SERVING UTAH, IDAHO, AND ARIZONA
Free Consultation:

What Is the Difference Between Express and Implied Consent?

What Is the Difference Between Express and Implied Consent?

Consent plays an important role in many personal injury cases. In general, consent means a person voluntarily agrees to a particular action or activity. When someone consents to certain conduct, it can affect whether another party may be held legally responsible for resulting injuries.

However, consent is not always communicated in the same way. In personal injury law, courts often distinguish between express consent and implied consent. 

Express consent occurs when someone clearly and directly agrees to something, either verbally or in writing. This type of consent is explicit and leaves little room for misunderstanding.

Examples of express consent may include:

  • Signing a liability waiver before participating in an activity
  • Verbally agreeing to physical contact during a sporting event
  • Signing a participation agreement for a recreational activity

In personal injury cases, defendants sometimes rely on express consent to argue that the injured person knowingly accepted certain risks associated with a dangerous activity. For example, someone who signs a waiver before participating in a zipline course may have acknowledged the ordinary risks involved in that activity.

However, express consent does not automatically prevent an injury claim. Liability waivers and consent agreements may not protect a business or individual from gross negligence or conduct outside the scope of the agreement.

Implied consent is inferred from a personโ€™s actions, behavior, or the surrounding circumstances. In other words, a personโ€™s conduct may suggest that they agreed to certain ordinary risks or interactions.

Examples of implied consent may include:

  • Participating in a contact sport where physical contact is expected
  • Entering a crowded event where minor incidental contact is unavoidable
  • Engaging in recreational activities that naturally involve certain risks

For example, a person playing in a basketball game generally implicitly consents to ordinary physical contact that occurs during normal gameplay. That does not mean players consent to intentional violence or reckless misconduct outside the normal scope of the sport.

Similarly, someone attending a baseball game may accept the ordinary risk of foul balls entering spectator areas.

Consent can be a defense in personal injury litigation. A defendant may argue that the injured person voluntarily accepted certain risks and therefore cannot hold others liable for resulting injuries.

These issues commonly arise in cases involving:

  • Recreational activities
  • Sporting events
  • Gyms and fitness facilities
  • Amusement attractions
  • Property access disputes
  • Physical altercations

Consent is closely related to the legal concept of assumption of risk. This doctrine may apply when a person voluntarily participates in an activity while understanding that certain risks are involved.

However, assumption of risk does not excuse every dangerous condition or negligent act. In Arizona, businesses and property owners still generally have a duty to maintain reasonably safe conditions and avoid unnecessary hazards under premises liability law.

Consent-related defenses can significantly affect personal injury claims. Insurance companies and defendants may try to argue that the injured person โ€œknew the risksโ€ or voluntarily accepted dangerous conditions. These arguments can limit their liability for an accident, but not for negligent or reckless conduct that went beyond what was reasonably anticipated.

An experienced personal injury attorney can analyze how consent and assumption of risk may apply to a particular case and challenge unfair attempts to avoid liability.

Contact Feller & Wendt, LLC To Schedule a Free Consultation With a Phoenix Personal Injury Attorney

Even when someone agreed to participate in an activity in Arizona, that does not necessarily eliminate the right to pursue compensation after a serious injury. If you were injured and another party claims you consented to the risk, you should speak with an experienced personal injury lawyer for help understanding your rights and evaluating your legal options. 

Contact Feller & Wendt, LLC at 480-702-2277 to schedule a free consultation with a personal injury lawyer in Phoenix to learn more.

Feller & Wendt, LLC – Layton Office
67 S. Main St., #100
Layton, UT, 84041
801-499-5060
801-421-1569


Feller & Wendt, LLC – St. George Office (by appointment only)
169 W 2710 S Cir, Suite 202-A
St. George, UT, 84790

801-499-5060
801-421-3132


Feller & Wendt, LLC – Salt Lake City Office
4424 South 700 East, Suite 240
Millcreek, UT, 84107

801-499-5060
801-421-2445

Ride there with Uber


Feller & Wendt, LLC – Phoenix Office
1 N 1st St, Suite 7550
Phoenix, AZ, 85004

480-702-2277
480-360-4471

Ride there with Uber


Feller & Wendt, LLC – Mesa Office
2222 S Dobson Rd, # 500
Mesa, AZ, 85202

480-702-2277
480-573-7601


Feller & Wendt, LLC – Boise Office
5536 N Eagle Rd,
Boise, ID, 83713

208-595-6953

Adam Dougherty

PARTNER / TRIAL ATTORNEY

ARIZONA

Adam Doughertyย is a partner and trial attorney at Feller & Wendt, LLC and serves injury victims throughout Arizona. Adam focuses on complex personal injury litigation involving car accidents, truck accidents, catastrophic injuries, wrongful death, and other serious negligence claims. With decades of experience in the courtroom, heโ€™s known for trying high-stakes cases and advocating for individuals against powerful insurance companies and corporations. Adam has earned recognition from Best Lawyers in America, National Trial Lawyers, Martindale-Hubbell, Elite Lawyer, and other leading legal organizations for his work in personal injury law.

Scroll to Top
Scan QR Code to Download
QR code