SERVING UTAH, IDAHO, AND ARIZONA
Free Consultation:

Why Do Insurance Companies Say Your Medical Treatment Is “Not Related, Not Reasonable, or Not Necessary”?

Why Do Insurance Companies Say Your Medical Treatment Is “Not Related, Not Reasonable, or Not Necessary”?

After an accident, many people assume the insurance company will review their medical bills and fairly cover the treatment they need. Unfortunately, the claims process does not always work that way. Insurance companies often look for ways to limit payouts, even when someone has legitimate injuries.

One of the most common insurance company tactics is arguing that your medical care was “not related, not reasonable, or not necessary.” These phrases may sound technical, but they are frequently used as part of a broader strategy to reduce or deny compensation.

Understanding how these arguments work can help you protect yourself when dealing with insurance adjusters after an accident.

The “Deny, Delay, Defend” Insurance Strategy

Many personal injury claims follow a pattern often described as “deny, delay, defend.” This approach focuses on minimizing how much insurers ultimately pay to injury victims.

The strategy often works like this:

  • Deny: The insurance company disputes the claim or certain damages.
  • Delay: The insurer slows the process, hoping the claimant becomes frustrated or feels financial pressure to settle.
  • Defend: If necessary, the company aggressively fights the claim through negotiations or litigation.

Your medical treatment is frequently targeted during this process because it often represents a significant portion of your claim.

How Insurance Companies Deny Claims by Challenging Medical Care

One of the most common ways insurers reduce payouts is by questioning medical treatment. Understanding how insurance companies deny claims can help you recognize when this tactic is being used.

Adjusters may review medical records and argue that certain treatments were unnecessary, unrelated to the accident, or excessive. In some cases, they rely on internal reviewers or outside medical consultants to support those arguments.

These disputes typically fall into three categories.

Insurance companies frequently argue that medical treatment was not caused by the accident at all. Instead, they may claim that:

  • Your injuries existed before the incident.
  • Your condition developed from another cause.
  • The accident could not have caused the symptoms you report.

For example, if you develop back pain after a car crash, the insurer might claim the issue is related to a preexisting condition or normal wear and tear rather than the collision.

This tactic can be especially frustrating for people who had minor symptoms before an accident that suddenly became much worse afterward.

“Not Reasonable” Treatment

Insurers may also argue that certain treatments were not “reasonable.” In practice, this usually means they believe your care was excessive or outside what they consider standard treatment.

For instance, an insurance adjuster might claim:

  • Too many diagnostic tests were performed.
  • Physical therapy lasted longer than necessary.
  • Certain procedures were more expensive than expected.

These arguments often rely on internal guidelines or outside opinions rather than the treating doctor’s professional judgment.

“Not Medically Necessary”

Another common argument is that treatment was “not medically necessary.” This claim is often used to challenge services such as:

  • Chiropractic care
  • Extended physical therapy
  • Pain management treatment
  • Diagnostic imaging, such as MRIs

Insurance companies may argue that you should have recovered sooner or required less treatment than their doctor recommended.

Independent Medical Examinations and Record Reviews

Insurance companies sometimes support these arguments by ordering what is called an independent medical examination (IME) or hiring medical professionals to review records.

Despite the name, these exams are typically arranged and paid for by the insurer. The doctor performing the evaluation may only see the injured person once and may review limited medical records.

The insurer may then rely on that opinion to challenge treatment recommendations or question the severity of the injuries.

Tactics Insurance Adjusters Use During Claims

Following an accident, it is important to remember that adjusters work for the insurance company, not the injured person.

Some common tactics include:

  • Requesting recorded statements early in the process
  • Asking questions that may minimize your injuries
  • Suggesting that treatment is unnecessary
  • Offering a quick settlement before your medical care is complete

While adjusters may appear friendly and cooperative, their primary responsibility is protecting the company’s financial interests.

Protecting Yourself After an Accident

If an insurer questions your treatment, several steps may help strengthen your claim.

First, follow your doctor’s treatment plan carefully and attend all recommended appointments. Gaps in treatment can give insurers additional opportunities to challenge your claim.

Second, keep detailed records of your medical care, including bills, reports, and treatment notes. Clear documentation often plays an important role when insurers question the validity of treatment.

Finally, it may help to speak with a personal injury attorney if the insurance company disputes your medical treatment or denies your claim.

Contact the Salt Lake City Personal Injury Lawyers at Feller & Wendt, LLC, for Help

If an insurance company is questioning your medical treatment after an accident in Utah, you do not have to handle the situation alone. Disputes about medical necessity, reasonableness, and causation are common insurance company tactics used to limit compensation.

The legal team at Feller & Wendt, LLC can review your case, explain your options, and help you respond to the insurer’s arguments. Reach out to our Salt Lake City personal injury lawyers to schedule a free consultation today.

Feller & Wendt, LLC – Layton Office
67 S. Main St. #100
Layton, UT, 84041

801-499-5060


Feller & Wendt, LLC – St. George Office (by appointment only)
169 W 2710 S Cir, Suite 202-A
St. George, UT, 84790

801-499-5060


Feller & Wendt, LLC – Salt Lake City Office
4424 South 700 East, Suite 240
Millcreek, UT, 84107

801-499-5060


Feller & Wendt, LLC – Phoenix Office
1 N 1st St, Suite 7550
Phoenix, AZ, 85004

480-702-2277

Ride there with Uber


Feller & Wendt, LLC – Mesa Office
2222 S Dobson Rd, # 500
Mesa, AZ, 85202

480-702-2277


Feller & Wendt, LLC – Boise Office
5536 N Eagle Rd,
Boise, ID, 83713

208-391-5945

Scroll to Top
Scan QR Code to Download
QR code